HOME Schematics Discover Forum Hobby Corner Dave's Circuits Electronic Resources Book Corner Contact Info


Wily Widget

  Previous Issues

Vertically Lifting Security Gate Power Source

Wily got a call from one of his old clients.  A few years earlier Wily had designed a control circuit for the client’s nifty security gate, which lifted vertically, instead of the usual horizontal motion.  The act of moving the gate vertically and folding up was ideal for mountain homes, where narrow roads and heavy snow depths were common.  His old client had a request from one of his customers who wanted a gate power source with a much longer life than the usual 3 to 5 years that a lead acid battery offered. The customer said that he had batteries die at some very inconvenient times.  Could Wily come up with something?
The vertical lifting security gates, as shown below, were most often installed far from any AC power source.  The standard system used a small 5 watt solar panel and a 12v sealed lead acid battery as a power source.  Both the battery and the control circuit board were housed inside an insulated plastic case.  A weather protected keypad on both sides of the gate allowed gate operation without getting out of the vehicle. Standard wireless garage door opener “clicker” remotes were also used.  Wily asked his old client some questions, mostly to refresh his memory about the gate system and to get information from his client’s customer.  Wily especially wanted to how often the gate was typically used each day.  Wily told his client that he thought he had a solution as long as the customer was willing to spend some money on a better energy storage device.
vertical gate vertical gate
The security gate was moved up and down using a 12v brush type DC motor, connected to a quality worm gear.  The motor drew about 5 Amps for 10 seconds, to raise or lower the gate.  Limit switches and the circuit board controlled the end of travel motion of the gate. The motor would work, even when the battery voltage was down to 8v, but would run slower, taking perhaps 20 seconds to operate. The RF keypads were a wireless type and contained their own battery.  The RF keypad receiver module, mounted on the control board, demanded very low power. The control circuit itself had a very low standby current demand. Overall, only the motor required energy to operate.  Wily’s client said that his customer used the gate infrequently; perhaps less than 4 complete up and down operations per 24 hour period and was used mostly during normal business hours. Wily figured that there could at least be two complete up and down cycles, during dark winter night conditions.  Any energy storage device would therefore have to provide at least enough energy for 4 motor activations, lasting 10 seconds each.
If Wily’s client’s customer wanted something other than a battery to store the needed energy, Wily figured that the best available device would be a supercapacitor bank. These new devices should last at least 10 or more years and could easily pump out the needed peak power.  Wily figured that he should plan to size the capacitor bank so it could operate the gate motor four times, without help from the solar panel.  The solar panel would be able to quickly charge up the capacitor between gate activations during sun lit days but much more slowly during cloudy days. 
Even on cloudy weather, a useful amount of power could be pumped into the supercapacitor.  During cloudy days, the available power from the 5 watt panel might only be about 5% of the full sunlight level or about 0.25 watts.  Assuming about 8 hours of daylight, that meant about 2 watt-hours could be collected, even on a cloudy day.  If the gate motor needed 60 watts for four 10 second operations, then the total energy needed for a typical day would only be 2400 watt-seconds, which would be 0.7 watt-hours.  The solar panel should therefore be able to pump enough power back into the supercapacitor to keep it charged.
So, in review, the gate would draw 5 Amps for 40 seconds from the super capacitor on a typical day. Wily decided to round this figure off to 60 seconds, for a 50% energy margin.  Starting from a fully charged 12v capacitor bank, Wily figured that the voltage drop should not exceed 3 volts.  This would take the capacitor bank down from a high of 12v to about 9v. 
Using the equation:  dv/dt = I/C Wily could calculate how big the capacitor should be.  If dv was 3 volts, dt was 60 seconds and I was 5 Amps, then C worked out to 100 farads.  Since most supercapacitors were rated at 2.5v, he would need to wire 5 capacitors in series to achieve a 12.5v bank.  Other supercapacitors had a 2.7v rating, so the voltage could range from a high of 13.5v to a low of 10.5v.  If the total capacitance had to be 100 farads then each device needed to be at least 500 farads.
Wily knew of several supercapacitor manufacturers, but he especially liked the parts from Maxwell.  Maxwell sold a nice 650 farad 2.7v part, which should work fine for this application. Five of them would yield a 13.5v 130 farad capacitor bank.  Wily liked the additional 30% storage this type of part would offer over his minimum 100 farad requirement.
Maxwell 650F supercapacitor RF keypad and Clicker 18v 5w solar panel
Maxwell 650F Supercapacitor  RF Keypad and Clicker 18v 5w Solar Panel

Just to double check his figures, Wily imagined how the gate might be used.  Starting with a fully charged capacitor bank, Wily imagined the home owner coming back from work at night, in total darkness.  The gate would be opened and then closed, drawing power from the supercapactor.  Then, early in the next morning, still in darkness, the gate would be opened and closed again.  These 4 motor cycles will cause the capacitor voltage to drop from 13.5v to 12v. Even if the gate needed to be operated two one more times, then there would still be enough energy stored to do it. During 8 full hours of cloudy weather the solar panel should be able to fully charge the capacitor bank.

Wily thought he better double check this assumption.  The 5 watt solar panel should be able to crank out about 300ma of current during clear sunlit days.  During very cloudy days, the charge current might drop to only 5% of that figure or about 15ma.  Wily used the same dv/dt = I/C equation to double check his figures.  dt would be 8 hours or 29,000 seconds, I would be 0.015 Amps and C would be 130 farads.  Therefore, dv would be 3.3 volts.  Good, that meant that even with a much smaller current from the solar panel during cloudy weather, the capacitor should still get charged.  When the sun came out, the solar panel current would jump up to 0.3 Amps again.  Then to pump 3 volts back into the capacitor, would only take 22 minutes.  Wily felt pretty good with these figures.  It was always a compromise between having enough stored energy and keeping the cost down.  If there were a string of very very cloudy days or the solar panel became covered in snow for several days, then a dead capacitor still might happen but the system would be able recover as soon as the sun came out.  A 10 watt solar panel might also be used to decrease the likelihood of a dead capacitor by increasing the available power during cloudy weather.    

Schematic of Vertically Lifting Security Gate Power Source

Wily Widget the Lone Inventor     Gadget & Gizmo


November 2009     Issue 3

Page 1 Back
Envelope
Circuit
Diagnosis
Experimenter's
Corner
Good Idea
gone Badly
New Products Rants &
Raves
What the World
needs Now
Wily Widget


HOME Schematics Index Hobby Corner Dave's Circuits Electronic Resources Contact Info
Imagineering Ezine    Discover Solar Energy Dave Johnson & Associates Faraday Touch Switches


 About Us   |  Advertise on DiscoverCircuits.com   |   Report Broken Links  |    Link to DiscoverCircuits.com  |    Privacy Policy

Copyright  2002 - 2015 David A. Johnson & Associates.  All Rights reserved. 
 Linking is ALLOWED but COPYING any content or graphics to your web site is EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.